PageFair’s long letter to the Article 29 Working Party

Dr Johnny Ryan GDPR Leave a Comment

This note discusses a letter that PageFair submitted to the Article 29 Working Party. The answers may shape the future of the adtech industry.  Eventually the data protection authorities of Europe will gain a thorough understanding of the adtech industry, and enforce data protection upon it. This will change how the industry works. Until then, we are in a period of uncertainty. Industry can not move forward, business can not flourish. Limbo does not serve the interests of publishers. Therefore we press for certainty. This week PageFair wrote a letter to the Article 29 Working Party presenting insight on the inner workings of adtech, warts and all. Our letter asked the working party to consider five questions. We suspect that the answers may shape the future of the adtech industry.…

GDPR’s non-tracking cookie banners

Dr Johnny Ryan GDPR Leave a Comment

This note outlines how an anomaly in European law will impact cookie storage and presents wireframes of permission requests for non-tracking cookies.  Online media will soon find itself in an anomalous position. It will be necessary to apply the GDPR’s consent requirements to cookies that reveal no personal data, even though the GDPR was not intended to be applied in this way.[1] Recital 26 of the GDPR says that “the principles of data protection should … not apply to anonymous information, namely information which does not relate to an identified or identifiable natural person…”.[2] Even so, a hiccup in the choreography of European Law making is creating an unexpected situation in which the GDPR’s conditions will apply to cookies that reveal or contain no personal data.…

GDPR consent design: how granular must adtech opt-ins be?

Dr Johnny Ryan GDPR Leave a Comment

This note examines the range of distinct adtech data processing purposes that will require opt-in under the GDPR.[1] In late 2017 the Article 29 Working Party cautioned that “data subjects should be free to choose which purpose they accept, rather than having to consent to a bundle of processing purposes”.[2] Consent requests for multiple purposes should “allow users to give specific consent for specific purposes”.[3]  Rather than conflate several purposes for processing, Europe’s regulators caution that “the solution to comply with the conditions for valid consent lies in granularity, i.e. the separation of these purposes and obtaining consent for each purpose”.[4] This draws upon GDPR, Recital 32.[5] In short, consent requests must be granular, showing opt-ins for each distinct purpose. How granular must consent opt-ins be?

The regulatory firewall for online media and adtech

The PageFair Team GDPR Leave a Comment

This note announces Perimeter, a regulatory firewall to enable online advertising under the GDPR. It fixes data leakage from adtech and allows publishers to monetize RTB and direct ads, while respecting people’s data.  PageFair takes a strict interpretation of the GDPR. To comply, all media owners need to protect their visitors’ personal data, or else find themselves liable for significant fines and court actions. In European Law, personal data includes not only personally identifiable information (PII), but also visitor IP addresses, unique IDs, and browsing history.[1] The problem is that today’s online ads operate by actively disseminating this kind of personal data to countless 3rd parties via header bidding, RTB bid requests, tracking pixels, cookie syncs, mobile SDKs, and javascript in ad creatives.…

Overview of how the GDPR impacts websites and adtech (IAPP podcast)

The PageFair Team GDPR Leave a Comment

In this podcast, the International Association of Privacy Professionals interviews PageFair’s Dr Johnny Ryan about the challenges and opportunities of new European privacy rules for website operators and brands.  Update: 3 January 2018: This podcast was the International Association of Privacy Professionals’ most listened to podcast of 2017.  The conversation begins at 4m 14s, and covers the following issues. Risks for website operators How “consent” is an opportunity for publishers to take the upper hand in online media Brands’ exposure to legal risk, and the agency / brand / insurer conundrum Personal data leakage in RTB / programmatic adtech How the adtech industry should adapt As we told Wired some months ago, it’s not just that websites might expose yourself to litigation, it’s that you might expose your advertisers to litigation too.…

Frequency capping and ad campaign measurement under GDPR

Sean Blanchfield GDPR Leave a Comment

This note describes how ad campaigns can be measured and frequency capped without the use of personal data to comply with the GDPR.  It is likely that most people will not give consent for their personal data to be used for ad targeting purposes by third parties (only a small minority [1] of people online are expected to consent to third party tracking for online advertising). Even so, sophisticated measurement and frequency capping are possible for this audience. This note briefly outlines how to conduct essential measurement (frequency capping, impression counting, click counting, conversion counting, view through measurement, and viewability measurement) in compliance with the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation. This means that publishers and advertisers can continue to measure the delivery of the ads that sustain their businesses, while simultaneously respecting European citizens’ right to protection of their personal data.…

Consent to use personal data has no value unless one prevents all data leakage

Dr Johnny Ryan GDPR Leave a Comment

Websites and advertisers can not prevent personal data from leaking in programmatic advertising. If not fixed, this will render consent to use personal data meaningless.  The GDPR applies the principle of transparency:[1] People must be able to easily learn who has their personal data, and what they are doing with it. Equally importantly, people must have surety that no other parties receive these data. It follows that consent is meaningless without enforcement of data protection: unless a website prevents all data leakage, a visitor who gives consent cannot know where their data may end up. But the online advertising system leaks data in two ways. This exposes brands, agencies, websites, and adtech companies to legal risk. How data leakage happens  If “programmatic”advertising or “real time bidding” was ever a mystery to you, take 43 seconds to watch this PageFair video.…

Research result: what percentage will consent to tracking for advertising?

Dr Johnny Ryan GDPR Leave a Comment

This note presents the results of a survey of 300+ publishers, adtech, brands, and various others, on whether users will consent to tracking under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Regulation.  In early August we published a note on consent, and asked whether people would click “yes”. We would like to thank the 300+ colleagues who responded to our research request. Now we present the results. UPDATE: 9 January 2018, SEE  MOST RECENT PAGEFAIR INSIDER NOTE ON GDPR CONSENT DIALOGUES from 8 January 2018.   Tracking for a single brand, on a single site. 305 respondents were asked by a publisher to permit a named brand and its analytics partners to track them on the site. A previous note explains the design of this notice.…

How the GDPR will disrupt Google and Facebook

Dr Johnny Ryan GDPR 22 Comments

Google and Facebook will be disrupted by the new European data protection rules that are due to apply in May 2018. This note explains how.  Google and Facebook will be unable to use the personal data they hold for advertising purposes without user permission. This is an acute challenge because, contrary to what some commentators have assumed, they cannot use a “service-wide” opt-in for everything. Nor can they deny access to their services to users who refuse to opt-in to tracking.[1] Some parts of their businesses are likely to be disrupted more than others. The GDPR Scale When one uses Google or Facebook.com one willingly discloses personal data. These businesses have the right to process these data to provide their services when one asks them to. …

Here is what GDPR consent dialogues could look like. Will people click yes?

Dr Johnny Ryan GDPR 4 Comments

THIS NOTE HAS NOW BEEN SUPERSEDED BY A A MORE RECENT PAGEFAIR INSIDER NOTE ON GDPR CONSENT DIALOGUES. PLEASE REFER TO THE NEW NOTE.  This note presents sketches of GDPR consent dialogues, and invites readers to participate in research on whether people will consent.  NoteIt is important to note that the dialogue presented in this note is only a limited consent notice. It asks to track behaviour on one site only, and for one brand only, in addition to “analytics partners”. This notice would not satisfy regulators if it were used to cover the vast chain of controllers and processors involved in conventional behavioural targeting. Consent requests In less than a year the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) will force businesses to ask Internet users for consent before they can use their personal data.…